Discipline Analysis Of Work, Motivation And Loyalty Towards Employee Performance (Case Study At Gorontalo State University)
Abstract
This study aims to partially determine the positive and significant influence of work discipline, motivation and loyalty on employee performance at Gorontalo State University. The population in this study is the State Civil Apparatus at Gorontalo State University, amounting to 247 people. The data collection method uses a questionnaire that is by collecting data through a list of questions and distributing questionnaires to employees at Gorontalo State University. The research results obtained that there is a significant influence by work discipline on employee performance in the Gorontalo State University environment. The better the application of work discipline on employees will also improve employee performance. There is a significant influence by work motivation on employee performance in the State University of Gorontalo. The high level of motivation possessed by employees is one of the keys in improving employee performance. So the existence of programs that are motivating work must be intensified even more. There is a significant influence by loyalty on the performance of employees in the environment of Gorontalo State University. Employee loyalty is the reason why labor turn over is so low. This was also triggered by the university's commitment to opening opportunities for its employees including honorary employees in achieving good career paths. There is a significant influence by work discipline, motivation, and loyalty simultaneously on employee performance in Gorontalo State University. This indicates that work discipline alone is not enough to stimulate employee performance. The implementation of preventive policies to direct employee behavior to be disciplined must also be supported by the existence of programs that can motivate employee work. That way employee loyalty can also be created and enhanced. Synergy between the three variables will have a positive impact on improving employee performance so that it will also affect the overall university performance as an outcome of employee performance. All of these factors are needed considering the vision of the university as a leading university in the Southeast Asian region which certainly requires strong support and commitment as well as good performance from all elements in Gorontalo State University.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2013. Sumber Daya Manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung
A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2016, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Ke Enam Belas PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
A.A.Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT.Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.
Airasian, PW dan M Russel. 2008 Classroom assessment : Concept and Applications. McGraw-Hill Higher education. Boston College.
Alex S. Nitisemito, 2002, Manajemen Personalia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Ancok, Djamaludin. Validitas dan reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian dalam
Effendi,Sofian., dan Singarimbun, Masri. 1995. Metode Penelitian Survai. EdisiRevisi. Jakarta : LP3 ES.
Anoraga, Panji, 2014. Psikologi Kerja, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Arikunto, S. (2006). “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu PendekatanPraktik”. Jakarta : PT RINEKA CIPTA.
Asri Warnanti dan Firstly Dito Pranata (2014). Motivasi dan disiplin kerja pengaruhnya terhadap kinerja pegawai pada bidang pendaftaran dan informasi penduduk di dinas kependudukan dan catatan sipil kota bekasi jawa barat. SEMINAR NASIONAL DAN CALL FOR PAPERS UNIBA 2014.
Good Governance Menuju Kesejahteraan dan Kemandirian
B. Siswanto Sastrohadiwiryo. 2002. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administrasi dan Operasional. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Bernardin, H. John, danJoyce E.A Russel. (2003). Human resource management (An Experimental Approach International Edition). Mc. Graw-Hill Inc.Singapore.
Budiyanto, M.T, Eko, 2013, Sistem Informasi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta, Graha Ilmu.
Danang, Sunyoto. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Buku Seru. http://repository.upi.edu/17628/4/S_MBS_1001311_Bibliography
Dwiyanto, Agus. 2006. “Transparansi Pelayanan Publik”, dalam Agus Dwiyanto,ed .2006. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Edy Sutrisno. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group.
Evawati Khumaedi (2016) Pengaruh Disiplin dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Sentra Operasi Terminal PT.Angkasa Pura II. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis Volume 2, Nomor 1, Maret 2016
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi, PT.Bumi Aksara Jakarta.
Indriantoro N dan Supomo B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Cetakan Kedua, Yogyakara; Penerbit BFEE UGM.
Istiningsih. (2006). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan terhadap Motivasi dan Kinerja Karyawan STMIK Amikom Yogyakarta, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajerial, VOL. 2. NO. 1. MARET 2006.
Joyce Sagita Novyanti, 2015. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Bappeda Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. e-Jurnal Katalogis, Volume 3 Nomor 1, Januari 2015 hlm 105-115
ISSN: 2302-2019
Kusumo, B.C.S. (2006). Hubungan antara Persepsi terhadap Iklim Organisasi dan Kepuasan Imbalan Kerja denga Loyalitas Kerja pada Karyawan . Surakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Moeheriono. 2012. “Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi”. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.7.2.449-462.2021
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Publisher:
Magister Pendidikan Nonformal Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Soedirman No. 06 Gorontalo 96128 e-mail: jurnalaksara@ung.ac.id
http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id