Nyanyian Buaian Pada Masyarakat Kaili Tinjauan Nilai Estetika Dan Nilai Relijius

Al - afandi

Abstract


This study aims to describe the aesthetic value and religious value in the cradle song of the Kaili tribe. In this study, several concepts and theories used are cultural theories that represent literary values. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with a naturalistic approach. Sources of data obtained from informants in the field. Data collection techniques used include direct observation, recording, interviews, and recording. Data analysis used interactive analysis with three stages of analysis, namely data reduction, data presentation, and inference. The lyrics of the Kaili cradle song were collected and analyzed in this study, which consisted of four verses obtained from four different informants. The results showed that the value of the lyrics of the cradle song included aesthetic values, namely: The value of the beauty of language seen in the array of repetitions of sounds generated from rhyme by using the sound patterns a, e, i, o in the middle of the word and at the end of the word. Religious values explain the Oneness of Allah and the qualities of the apostle that must be brought to life in the child.

Keywords


Aesthetic Values and Religious Values of Buain's Song

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Hadi, 2004. Hermeneutika, Estetika, dan Religiusitas. Esai-esai Sastra

Sufistik dan Seni Rupa. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Matahari.

Anonym“Sosial Budaya Sulawesi Tengah” dalam http://www.google.co.id/sosialbudaya-

Sulawesi-Tengah/ diakses pukul 23.45 pada tanggal 03 Januari 2015

Bagus Lorens (2000), Kamus Filsafat. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta

Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The Death of the Author”. New York: Hill and Wang.

Djamaris Edwar, 2002. Pengantar Sastra Rakyat Minangkabau. Yayasan Obor

Indonesia. Jakarta

Danandjaja, James. 2002. Folklor Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafiti.

_____________. 2007. Folklor Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafiti.

Endraswara, Suwardi 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Folklor. Media Presindo. FBS

Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

_____________,2013. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. CAPS Center for Academic

Publishing Service. Yogyakarta.

Kutaratna Nyoman, 2009. Stilistika. Kajian Puitika Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya.

Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Koentjaraningrat. 1984. Kebudayaan, Mentalitas, dan Pembangunan. Jakarta:

Gramedia

______________. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Mulyana, (2004), Mengartikulasikan Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung, Alfabeta.

Maryaeni. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kebudayaan Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Maryati dan suryawati, 2007. Sosiologi Untuk SMA Kelas XI. Erlangga. Surabaya.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2002. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press

Pudentia, 2007. Hakikat Kelisanan dalam Tradisi Lisan Melayu Mak Yong. Depok:

Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia.

Rozak Abdul, dkk. 1997. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta.

Sutopo, H.B. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar Teori dan Terapannya

dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Tim Redaksi Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Edisi III. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Tarigan, Henri Guntur,1986. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Sastra. Bandung :Angkasa

Teeuw, A. 1984. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Waluyo, 2002. Apresiasi dan Pengkajian Cerita Fiksi. Salatiga: Widya Sari Press Zulfahnur, Z.F, dkk. 1996/1997. Teori Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Depdikbud




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.8.2.1193-1208.2022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Publisher:
Magister Pendidikan Nonformal Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Soedirman No. 06 Gorontalo 96128 e-mail: jurnalaksara@ung.ac.id
http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id