Public Trust Reconstruction Strategy: The Case of the North Gorontalo Regency Government After the Re-Vote

Raihan A. Hanasi, Rusli Isa

Abstract


The election of the Regent and Deputy Regent of North Gorontalo in 2024 is experiencing legal tension that has given rise to a Re-Vote (PSU). The uncertainty caused by this legal dispute has led to a decline in public trust in the democratic process and local government. This research aims to identify the strategies implemented by the North Gorontalo Regency Government in rebuilding public trust after PSU. The method used is a qualitative approach with case studies, where data is collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, and documentation studies. The analysis was carried out thematically to outline the condition of public trust and evaluate government strategies. The results of the study show that local governments implement strategies of transparency, open communication, community involvement, and improving the quality of public services. Despite the challenges related to information disclosure and local political dynamics, these efforts have succeeded in restoring some of the public's trust. The research also provides recommendations for future policies, emphasizing the importance of effective communication and active community participation in strengthening public trust.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armstrong, E. (2005). Integrity, Transparency and Accountability in Public Administration: Recent Trends, Regional and International Developments and Emerging Issues. Integrity, Transparency and Accountability in Public Administration: Recent Trends, Regional and International Developments and Emerging.

Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388

Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militant Participatory Democracy: Civic Movements and Political Change in Porto Alegre. Cambridge University Press.

Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability. Governance, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033

Botan, C. H., & Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2023). Public Relations Theory III: In the Age of Publics. In Public Relations Theory III: In the Age of Publics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141396

Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053882

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Participation, trust, and public sector legitimacy. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1756–1773.

Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685

De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context-Bound Relationship. Governance, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking about empowered participatory governance. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.

Gilley, B. (2006). Political legitimacy and state fragility. World Politics, 58(3), 446–477

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048

Hallahan, K. (2015). Strategic consistency and message integrity in public communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 835–851.

Hanasi, R. A. (2024). Optimalisasi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Menggali Dampak Kompetensi dan Motivasi Pegawai (Abdurrahman, Ed.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). Deepublish. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=llMLQG8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=llMLQG8AAAAJ:ufrVoPGSRksC

Hendrayady, A., Sari, AR, Mustanir, A., Amane, AP, Isa, R., Agusman, Y., & Arief, MH. (2023). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. Pertama. Disunting oleh DP Sari. Padang: Global Eksekutif Teknologi. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=DtOb4BAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=DtOb4BAAAAAJ:rbm3iO8VlycC

Isa, Rusli. (2009). “Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung Sebagai Legitimasi Kepemimpinan Di Era Otonomi Daerah.” Jurnal Inovasi 6, no. 02.

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=DtOb4BAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=DtOb4BAAAAAJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC

Jenkins, S., & Grimley, S. (2021). Public sector communication and cultural context: Lessons from community engagement. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3)

Karp, J. A., Nai, A., & Norris, P. (2018). Dial ‘F’ for fraud: Explaining citizens suspicions about elections. Electoral Studies, 53, 11–19.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2018.01.010

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, transparency, and trust in local government. In Public Administration Review (Vol. 72, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x

Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. In Annual Review of Political Science (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. In Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392554

Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct Public Engagement in Local Government. American Review of Public Administration, 44(4 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013519702

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.

Porumbescu, G. (2017). Linking Transparency to Trust in Government and Voice. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015607301

Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (2021). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. In A Century in Books: Princeton University Press 1905–2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/2620793

UNESCAP. (2020). What is Good Governance?

UNDP. (2021). Trust in Public Institutions: A conceptual framework and insights for improved governance programming. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/

https://files.acquia.undp.org/public/migration/oslo_governance_centre/Trust-in-Public-Institutions-Policy-Brief_FINAL.pdf

Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9). https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq092

Ventura, M. F. S., & Takahashi, Y. (2024). Procedural Justice, Representation, and Institutional Trust in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 17(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X241288248




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/ppj.v6i3.3021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office of Public Policy Journal; Program Administrasi Publik Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Jendral Sudirman Street, Number 6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province 96128, Indonesia. Telp. +628114390095; +6281340097196 (Call/SMS/WA) E-mail: public_policy_journal@ung.ac.id

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

INDEXING: