The Implementation of Contantia Justitia in Religious Courts During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Muhammad Yusuf Putra, Fenty U. Puluhulawa, Nur Mohamad Kasim

Abstract


This study aims to examine the Implementation of E-Court during the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Support for the Contante Justitie Principle in the Religious Courts. This type of research is empirical legal research, which uses a qualitative approach method, with Primary Data sources obtained directly. The results showed that the implementation of the Electronic Justice System (E-Court) during the Covid-19 Pandemic at the Gorontalo Class 1A Religious Court was comprehensively in accordance with the principles of Contantia Justitia or simple, fast and low cost justice, because it had been implemented from the time of receipt and registration of cases to the reading of case decisions carried out electronically using online applications that had been officially developed by the Supreme Court such as e-Filling (case registration), e-Payment (case fee), e-Summons (Summons of Parties), e-Litigation (trial), e-Copy (Copy of Decision), and e-Sign (Signature), and supported by online communication channel applications such as zoom cloud meeting, google meet, email, and even telephone lines.


Keywords


Contant Justitie; Covid-19; E-Court; Gorontalo; Implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Adonara, Firman Floranta. 2015. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (2): 217–36.

Agusta, Oleh Ivanovich. n.d. “Teknik Pengumpulan dan Analisis Data Kualitatif.”

Akmal, Khairul. 2011. “PELAKSANAAN TUGAS PANITERA DALAM PEMBERIAN AKTA CERAI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BANGKINANG (Tinjauan Terhadap Pasal 84 Ayat 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989).” Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Sarif Kasim Riau.

“ANALISIS KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM KAJIAN TEORI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN EFEKTIVITAS HUKUM | PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum.” n.d. Accessed June 6, 2023. https://www.journal.ubb.ac.id/progresif/article/view/202.

“ANGKA KEJAHATAN DAN REAKSI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 | Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi.” n.d. Accessed June 6, 2023. https://jurnalmahupiki.org/ojs/index.php/jhpk/article/view/4.

Atikah, Ika. 2018. “Implementasi E-Court Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Advokat Dalam Proses Penyelesaian P Rkara Di Indonesia.” In Open Society Conference, 107:127.

Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. 2010. “Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian Dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum Di Peradilan Perdata.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 22 (2): 347–59.

Iqbal, Muhamad, Susanto Susanto, and Moh Sutoro. 2020. “E-COURT DALAM TANTANGAN MENEKAN POTENSI KORUPSI DI PENGADILAN.” PROCEEDINGS UNIVERSITAS PAMULANG 1.

“LEGALITAS PERSIDANGAN DARING DI MASA PANDEMI COVID – 19 DALAM PESPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA | Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian.” n.d. Accessed June 6, 2023. https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/view/225.

Mustapa, Iqbal, Zamroni Abdussamad, and Mellisa Towadi. 2022. “Positive Fictional Authority Legislative Ratio in Government Administration Laws and Job Creation Laws.” Damhil Law Journal 2 (1): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v1i1.1726.

Pangestu, Wiratih Dwi. 2008. “Pengaturan Asas Contante Justitie (Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan) Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.”

Rahmatullah, Indra. 2017. “MENEROBOS SEKAT ADMINISTRASI PERADILAN.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1 (2): 117–30. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2017.v1.i2.p117-130.

Rays, M. Ikhwan. 2018. “TINJAUAN NORMATIF TERHADAP SURAT KAPOLRI NOMOR: B/3022/XII/2009 PERIHAL PENANGANAN KASUS PIDANA MELALUI ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) DALAM PENERAPAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN.” Linear: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 2 (2): 45–50.

Rifqi, Muhammad Jazil. 2020. “Perkembangan Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 7 (1): 70–82.

Saleh, Putra Akbar. 2013. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Mengabaikan Bukti Keterangan Saksi Di Dalam Persidangan.” Lex Et Societatis 1 (1).

Sidharta, B. Arief, and J. J. H. Brugguink. 1999. Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Citra Aditya.

“TEORI HUKUM SEBAGAI SARANA ALAT UNTUK MEMPERBAHARUI ATAU MEREKAYASA MASYARAKAT | Lathif | PALAR (Pakuan Law Review).” n.d. Accessed June 6, 2023. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/palar/article/view/402.

Turuki, Zulfikar, Nirwan Junus, and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson. 2023. “Analysis of the Impact of Covid-19 in Triggering Spouse Conflict Leading to Divorce.” Damhil Law Journal 3 (2): 109–28. https://doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v3i2.1891.

Usrin, M. 2018. “Analisis Yuridis Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Solusi 16 (1): 60–65.

Wangol, Winly A. 2016. “Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP.” Lex Privatum 4 (7).

Zamroni, M. 2019. PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM: PEMBIAYAAN MODAL VENTURA DI INDONESIA KONTEMPORER. MEDIA SAHABAT CENDEKIA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v3i2.1945

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Yusuf Putra, Fenty U. Puluhulawa, Nur Mohamad Kasim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.