The Relationship of Proto Austronesian (PAN) and Minangkabau Languages (Comparative Historical Linguistic Studies)

Akmal Akmal, Suparmadi Suparmadi, Zulkarnain Sirait

Abstract


This study was languages focused on comparative historical linguistics. The comparisons between two or more languages can be said to be age-appropriate with the emergence of linguistics itself. Understanding of a language is very interesting to know the extent to which there are similarities or similarities between aspects of the language that discussed the relationship of Proto Austronesian and Minangkabau. This study used the descriptive quantitative research design. These data were taken from the corpus (internet document) and also went to the field by interviewing the native speakers of the Minangkabau language. The researchers have found 97 related vocabularies that consist of 36 identical pairs, 27 pairs that had phonemic correspondences, 25 phonetic similarities, and 9 different phonemes. After calculating the percentage of kinship, the result of kinship is 49%. That means the kinship between the Proto-Austronesian language and the Minangkabau language is very close. From the findings of the related vocabularies, it could be explained that the Proto-Austronesian and Minangkabau languages are very close because they have had more than 20 % (twenty percent).

Keywords


comparative; phonemic; proto-austronesian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second Edi, pp. 1–26). SAGE.

Crowley, F., & Bowern, C. (2010). An Introduction to Historical Linguistics: Fourth Edition (Fourth Edi). Oxford University Press. www.oup.com

Dalimunthe, S. R. (2018a). Family Relationship of Batak Mandailing Language and Tanah Ulu Language (A Comparative Historical Linguistic Study). Medan Meaning, 16(1), 84–91.

Dalimunthe, S. R. (2018b). HUBUNGAN KEKERABATAN BAHASA BATAK MANDAILING DAN BAHASA TANAH ULU ( SUATU KAJIAN LINGUISTIK HISTORIS KOMPARATIF ) Family Relationship Of Batak Mandailing and Tanah Ulu Language ( A Historic Comparative Linguistic Study ). Medan Makna, XVI(1), 84–91.

Disman, D., Ali, M., & Syaom Barliana, M. (2017). the Use of Quantitative Research Method and Statistical Data Analysis in Dissertation: an Evaluation Study. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.5566

Dwi, S. &, & Widayati. (2018). Haloban Languages , Nature , and Gayo Language : Comparative Linguistic Study. 41(2), 215–221.

Elliott, J. (2005). Using Narrative in Social Research (First Publ). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Fatinah, S. (2017). Kekerabatan Bahasa Kulawi Dan Bahasa Kaili Di Sulawesi Tengah. Kandai, 13(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i2.245

Fitrah, Y., & Afria, R. (2017). Kekerabatan Bahasa-Bahasa Etnis Melayu, Batak, Sunda, Bugis, dan Jawa Di Provinsi Jambi: Sebuah Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif. Jurnal Titian, 1(2), 204–2018. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/titian/article/view/4228/3012

Iran Adhiti, I. A. (2019). Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif Pada Pola Perubahan Bunyi. KULTURISTIK: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Budaya, 3(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.22225/kulturistik.3.2.1203

Musayyedah. (2015). Korespondensi Fonemis Bahasa Bali Dan Bahasa Sumbawa. Sawerigading, 21(3), 415–424.

Nasoichah, C., Widayati, D., & Mulyadi. (2021). Jejak Bahasa Proto-Austronesia Pada Prasasti Gunung Tua (Lokanātha). Naditira Widya, 15(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.24832/nw.v15i1.455

Novita, S., & Widayati, D. (2018). Kekerabatan Kosa Kata Bahasa Karo , Bahasa Nias , dan Bahasa Simalungun di Kota Medan : Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif. Linguistika, 26(2), 109–125.

Ringe, D., & Eska, J. F. (2010). Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. In Historical Linguistics: Toward a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183

Sciences, H. (2020). Hubungan Kekerabatan Bahasa Bali dan Sasak dalam Ekoleksikon Kenyiuran: Analisis Linguistik Historis Komparatif. Journal Inov and Penelitian, 1(1), 27–30.

Stevens, A. M., & Nothofer, B. (1977). The Reconstruction of Proto-Malayo-Javanic. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 97(3), 359. https://doi.org/10.2307/600785

Surbakti, E. B. (2014). Kekerabatan Bahasa Karo, Minang, dan Melayu: Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 11(1), 1–21.

Widayati, D. (2016). Vocal and Consonant PAN Features in Nias and Sigulai Languages. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v2i4.291

Widayati, D. (2019). Teknik Leksikostatistik dan Glotokronologi Penetapan hubungan kekerabatan (Vol. 4, p. 29). Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Widayati, D., Feature, V., Languages, N., Languages, S., & Language, D. (2016). Vocal and Consonant PAN Features in Nias and Sigulai Languages. International Journal of Linguistics, Literarture, and Culture, 2(4), 86–96.

Yuniawan, T., Rokhman, F., Rustono, R., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2017). The Study of Critical Eco-Linguistic in Green Discourse: Prospective Eco-Linguistic Analysis. Jurnal Humaniora, 29(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.27441




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.9.1.615-624.2023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Magister Pendidikan Nonformal Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Soedirman No. 06 Gorontalo 96128 e-mail: jurnalaksara@ung.ac.id
http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id