Learning Preference Generasi Z Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Angkatan 2019 Di Universitas ‘X’ Bandung

Fifie Nurofia, Jacqueline Tjandraningtyas

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapat gambaran mengenai Learning Preferences pada mahasiswa yang termasuk Generasi Z di Fakultas Psikologi Universitas ‘X’ Bandung, yang diwakili oleh mahasiswa Angkatan 2018, 2019 dan 2020, sebanyak 157 mahasiswa diminta untuk mengisi kuesioner Learning Style Inventories sesuai konsep Learning Preferences dari Gulbahar & Ayfer (2011) melalui google form. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksploratif dengan metode deskriptif dengan Teknik survey ini berusaha untuk mendapatkan 8 e-learning styles, yaitu Individual/Solitary, Social/Collaborative, Auditory, Concrete, Logic, Visual, Abstract, dan Sensual e-Learning Styles. Alat ukur telah melalui uji Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Berdasarkan Hasil Olah Data, dapat ditarik simpulan bahwa semua e-Learning Styles digunakan oleh generasi Z dengan karakteristik yang terbanyak digunakan adalah ISL yang merupakan belajar secara mandiri dengan mengandalkan Self-reliance. Sementara yang paling jarang digunakan adalah Abstract dan Sensual e-Learning Style. Saran secara umum yang dapat diberikan adalah meng-encourage e-learning Styles generasi Z agar terjadi learning online dengan metoda yang efektif.

Keywords


Learning preferences; generation Z; Learning online

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yasemin Gülbahar1 Ayfer Alper2 Learning Preferences and Learning Styles of Online

Adult Learners, Article · January 2011

Akdemir, O., & Koszalka, T. A. Investigating the relationships among instructional

strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers and Education, 2008;50(4):1451-1461.

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. A Study of Student’s Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 2008;11(1):183-193.

Butler, T. J. & Pinto-Zipp, G. Students’ learning styles and their preferences for online

instructional methods. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2005;34(2):199-221.

Butler, T. J. Students’ learning styles and their preferences for online instructional

methods. Unpublished Dissertation Thesis, Seton Hall University;2004.

Coole, H. & Watts, M. Communal e-learning styles in the online classroom. Research in Education, 2009;82:13-27.

Cooze, M. & Barbour , M. Learning Styles: A Focus upon E-Learning Practices and their

Implications for Successful Instructional Design. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 2007;4(1):7-20.

Grasha, A. Teaching with style: a practical guide to enhancing learning by

understanding teaching and learning styles.Pittsburgh, PA:Alliance Publishers; 1996.

Keefe, J. W. Learning style: An overview. In National association of secondary school

principals (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, 1979;1-17.

Kia, M. M., Aliapour, A., & Ghaderi, E. Study of learning styles and their roles in the

academic achievement of the students of Payame Noor University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2009;10 (2): 24-37. Available at: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde34/index.htm Accessed June15,2011.

Kolb, D. A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and

development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1984.

Kolb, D. A. Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.; 1976.

Memletics Learning Style Inventory; 2004. Available at:

http://www.ronniejohnson.info/files/Creative%20Teaching/Memletics-Learning-Styles-Inventory.pdf

Palloff, R. M. & Pratt K. The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online

learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.

Rogers, P. R. & McNeil, K. Student Learning Styles and Online Course Performance: An Empirical Examination of Student Success in Web-Based Management Courses. Business Education Digest, 2009;18:1-15.

Seemiller, Corey & Grace, Meghan, 2016. Generation Z Goes to College, John-Wiley & Sons, San Fransisco. USA

Soles, C. & Moller, L. Myers Briggs Type Preferences in Distance Learning Education, International Journal of Educational Technology, 2001: 2(2). Available at: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ijet/v2n2/soles/index.html.Accessed June 15, 2011.

Soles, C., & L. Moller. Myers Briggs type preferences in distance learning education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 2001; 2 (2). Available at: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ijet/v2n2/soles/index.html. Accessed June15,2011.

.Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Jakarta: Alfabeta

Willems, J. Does style matter? Considering the impact of learning styles in e-learning. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/willemsposter.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.9.1.511-520.2023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Magister Pendidikan Nonformal Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Soedirman No. 06 Gorontalo 96128 e-mail: jurnalaksara@ung.ac.id
http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id