Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

DLJ focuses on two main aspects:

  1. Legal System in Indonesia: Research that examines the elements that shape and influence the legal system in Indonesia, both from a theoretical and practical perspective.
  2. Legal Studies in the Context of Developing Countries: An examination of how Indonesian law interacts with social, economic, and political issues common to developing countries, as well as how law can serve as an instrument to achieve sustainable development.

Scope:
The scope of this journal is quite broad, covering various areas of law relevant to the study of law in Indonesia. Some of the areas that fall under the scope of DLJ are:

  • Civil Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Constitutional and Administrative Law
  • Customary Law
  • Air and Space Law
  • Islamic Law
  • International Law
  • Legal Pluralism
  • Contemporary Issues in Law

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Publication of articles in Damhil Law Journal (DLJ) is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Damhil Law Journal (DLJ) acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers. 

Initial Evaluation of Manuscripts

The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Damhil Law Journal (DLJ). Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.

Type of Peer Review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is double-blind peer review.

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. The editor’s decision is final.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.