THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY AT MIMOZA MULTIMEDIA GORONTALO

Rendy Rianto Rahim, Walidun Husain, Fenti Prihatini Dance Tui

Abstract


The research aims to analyze and describe (1) the quality of service delivery in terms of customers’ satisfaction at Mimoza Multimedia and (2) the factors affecting the quality of service delivery at Mimoza Multimedia. The research method used is qualitative method. The data are the primary data collected through interviews. The data analysis used is Miles and Huberman’s analysis model. The research findings indicate that (1) Mimoza Multimedia Gorontalo has been able to provide public services for society. However, service delivery should be improved through more progressive service polices and evaluations to elevate customers’ satisfaction level. Some aspects of public service delivery that fulfill customers’ satisfaction are adequate facilities and infrastructures, guarantee or compensation to unsatisfactory services, and empathy shown by employees. Meanwhile, responsiveness and reliability are two aspects which need improvement through capacity building in terms of the public service delivery at Mimoza Multimedia Gorontalo and (2) The service delivery at Mimoza Multimedia Gorontalo relies on the quality of human resources, communication between the employees, and communication between the employees and customers. Customers’ satisfaction depends on competent and committed human resources to delivering public services in accordance with service principles. Moreover, the supporting factor is communication. Services without good communication will not satisfy customers.


References


Abdussamad, Zuchri. 2008. Tantangan dan Prospek Komunikasi Politik Indonesia Dalam Negara Kesejahteraan. Jurnal INOVASI, Volume 5, Number 3, September 2008 ISSN 1693-9034.

Abdussamad, Zuchri. 2015. The Influence of Communication Climate on the Employees’ Performance at Government Agencies in Gorontalo City (an Indonesian Case Study). Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 3, No. 5, December 2015 Part I.

Afrial J, R. 2009. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Kecamatan Setelah Perubahan Kedudukan dan Fungsi Camat sebagai Perangkat Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 16(2), 87–95.

Almasdi, Jusuf Suit, 2012, Aspek Sikap Mental dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Syiar Media.

Bursan Rinaldi and Chanerie. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Samsat Bandar Lampung terhadap Kepuasan Wajib Pajak. JMK, Vol 10 No. 2.

Gaspersz, Vincent. 1997. Manajemen Kualitas. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka. Utama.

Hardjosoedarmo, Soewarso. 1996. Bacaan Terpilih tentang Total Quality. Management, Yogyakarta: Andi.

Hardiyansyah. 2011. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media

Kasmir, 2011, “Analisis Laporan Keuangan”, Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

Kuntjoro, Zainudin Sri. 2012. Komitmen Organisasi, e-psikologi.com.

Kurniawan, Agus. 2005. Transformasi Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pembaruan.

Moenir H.A.S. 2002. Manajemen Kantor. Jakarta: Yudhistira.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2011. Kybernology (Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Pasolong, Harbani 2013, Teori Administrasi Publik, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Pasolong, Harbani. 2008. Kepemimpinan Birokrasi. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Ratminto and Winarsih, Atik Septi. 2010. Manejemen Pelayanan. Yogyakarta: 171 Pustaka Pelajar.

Ri’aeni, Ida. 2017. Industri Media Massa Lokal dalam Tinjauan Manajemen Media Ideal (online), Vol. 1 No. 1. (e-journal.umc.ac.id/index.php/jike/article/download/51/26 retrieved January 28th, 2020)

Supranto, J. 2011. Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan untuk Menaikkan. Pangsa Pasar, Cetakan keempat. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta.

Sutedja, Wira. 2007. Panduan Layanan Konsumen. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo

Sunyoto, Danang and Fathonah Eka Susanti. 2015. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa.Yogyakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service.

Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014. Pemasaran Jasa. Andi: Yogyakarta.

Zeithaml, Valerie A., A. Parasurman, & Leonard L. Berry. 1990. Delivering Quality Service. New York: the Free Press.


Article metrics

Abstract views : 14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.