PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

Sarson W. Dj. Pomalato, Moh. Fadly a. Dg. Matona, Abd. Djabar Mohidin

Abstract


This study aimed to obtain the following information. (1). differences in mathematical problem solving ability of students that learned approach that learned Scientific and direct approach (2) the effect of the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation toward mathematics problem solving abilities of learners (3) differences in mathematical problem solving ability of students that learned with the scientific approach dibelajarkan direct approach to students who have high motivation. (4) differences in mathematical problem solving ability of students, who are teaching in the scientific approach and that learned to use a direct approach to the learners who have low motivation. The research was conducted in SMP 6 Luwuk in October 2014 through to January 2015, with the type of quasi-experimental research design or Quasi-Experiment and Treatment by Level. Sample selection is done using cluster random sampling technique. Selected sample of each dibelajarkan scientific approach and that learned direct approach. Research data collection using: (1) test the ability of solving problem in the form of a description, and (2) learning motivation test questionnaire form. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis. Descriptive analysis is performed to present the raw data through the research results into a table and then visualize the shape of the histogram inferential analysis to test the hypothesis. Test the hypothesis using Analysis of Variance Two Paths. Furthermore, to determine the significance of interactions between variables further research then tested using the Tukey test. This study resulted in four findings: (1) The ability of solving mathematical problems students that learned scientific approach is higher than the mathematical problem solving ability of students that learned the direct approach (2) There is interaction between learning approach to learning motivation of students to problem-solving abilities mathematics learners. (3) The ability of solving mathematical problems students who have high motivation to learn that learned scientific approach is higher than that learned the direct approach. (4) The ability of solving mathematical problems students who have low learning motivation that learned scientific approach is lower than that learned the direct approach


Keywords


Scientific Approach, Direct Approach and Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas Nurhayati, 2013. Bahan Ajar Statistika Penelitian, Gorontalo.

Abbas , Nurhayati. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Makalah disajikan pada workshop penulisan karya ilmiah guru-guru SMA/SMK/MA se-Provinsi Gorontalo

Abdurrahman. 2003. Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Abidin, Yunus. 2014. Desain Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung : PT. Reflika Aditama.

Arikunto Suharsimi, 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Cetakan ke-15. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Baldwin, A.L. 1967. Theories of Child Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Bandono, Adi. 2003. Model Pembelajaran Langsung. (http//www/pembelajaran langsung.adibandono-htm) diakses pada tanggal 23 April 2014

Carin, A.A. & Sund, R.B. 1975. Teaching Science trough Discovery, 3rd Ed. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Djamarah & Zain. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Rev. ed. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Fadjar, Shadiq. 2004. Pemecahan Masalah, Penalaran, dan Komunikasi. (Online). Tersedia: http://fadjarp3g.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/what-research-says-aboutmathematical-problem-solving, [21 september 2014]

Ferguson, George A, 1976. Statistical Analyisis in Psychology & Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Hulukati, Evi. (2005). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Peserta didik SMP Melalui Model Pembelajaran Generatif. Disertasi. UPI

Jaini, Arwin. (2009). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Tesis. UNG

Jumaris, M. 2013. Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pendidikan . Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kemendikbud, 2013b. Modul Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 SMA/MA dan SMK/MAK Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Khotib, Muhamad, dkk. 2011. Teori Pendekatan Pemebelajaran. https//kuliahemka.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/teori-pendekatan-pembelajaran//. Diakses tanggal 26 Januari 2015.

Maliki, Zainudin. 2010. Sosiologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Mohidin, Abd. Djabar. 2004. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajarandan gaya kognitif peserta didik terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Disertasi. PPS UNJ. Jakarta

NCTM. 2000. Defining Problem Solving. (Online).(http://,A,u,Nv.IeLirtiei-.or(,/chaiiellCOLti-,,,es/teacliin(-, iiiatli/,,raciesk-'-"Isessio11- 03/sectio 03 a..html, diakses 20 September 2014.

Nurhadi, M. 2004. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Nur, M. & Wikandari, P.R. 2000. Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Peserta didik Dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis Dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya : Universitas Negeri Surabaya University Press.

Panjaitan. 2009. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pernecahan Masalah Matematika Peserta didik SMP Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Medan: PPS UNIMED.

Pautina Titi, 2009. Hubungan antara gaya kognitif dan motivasi belajar peserta didik dengan hasil belajar matematika. Tesis. Gorontalo: PPs Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.

Robbin, Sthephen P. 2007. Organizational Behavior11 thEdition. Pearson Prentic Hall. New Jersey

Slavin, R. 1998. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Four Edition. Boston: Ally and Bacon

Slavin. R. E. 2006. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Eight Edition. Boston : Pearson.

Sudjana. 2001. Metode Statistika. Bandung. Tarsito

Sudrajat, A. 2013. Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Proses Pembelaaran. Akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/pendekatan-saintifikilmiah-dalam proses pemebelajaran..

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung, Alfabeta.

Suherman, dkk. 2001. Strategi Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Bandung:FMIPA UPI

Suyanta, I Nyoman 2013. Pengaruh Kualitas Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika. Tesis. UNG

Suyono dan Haryanto. 2012. Belajar dan pembelajaran: Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Uno, Hamzah, 2006. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bukmi Aksara.

Uno, Hamzah, 2007. Propesi kependidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Utari, sumarmo. (1994). Suatu alternatif pengajaran untuk meningkatkan kemampuan problem solving matematika pada guru dan peserta didik SMP. Laporan Hasil penelitian. Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan

Usman, Fatima. 2013. Meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika melalui model problem based learning materi sistem persamaan linear kelas x1 di sma negeri 1 luwuk kecamatan luwuk kabupaten banggai.Tesis.UNG

Wardani, Sri (2010). Pembelajaran kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika di SMP. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK

Wicaksono, Dirgantara. 2010. Pendekatan Langsung dalam Pembelajaran. http://kiteklik.blogspot.com/2010/08/pendekatan-langsung-dalam pembelajaran.html#sthash.ViTgOXF1. Diakses tanggal 26 Januari 2015

Yusdi, Milwan. 2010. Psikologi pendidikan dan aplikasinya. Jakarta : Gramedia


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.