Legal Status of Execution of Liability Auction Winner through Parate Executie

Yosia Hetharie

Abstract


Based on the Mortgage Law, there are three types of execution of mortgage rights, namely executorial title, parate executie, and underhand execution. Parate executie is carried out by the holder of the first mortgage right if the debtor defaults through the State Property and Auction Service Office. The provisions and procedures for conducting an auction are regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 213/PMK.06/2020 Concerning Instructions for Conducting Auctions. However, in practice there are still many problems or conflicts and many obstacles that occur. For example, there is no legal certainty for auction winners who have good intentions because they cannot immediately obtain their rights legally and materially. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research which is descriptive analytical using a qualitative approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials through library research. Based on the research results, the Auction Winner as a buyer in good faith has a position as the right holder of the auction object both formally and physically as a mortgage object. Therefore, the winner of the auction with good faith is entitled to all of his rights both in terms of formal juridical evidence and the physical object of the mortgage object. In this position, the KPKNL has the responsibility of examining all sales conditions and fulfilling all stages and appointing an auction official as the executor of the sale so that as long as the requirements and processes are carried out according to the instructions for conducting the auction.

Keywords


Auction Winner; Execution; Mortgage right

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Burhanuddin. 2006. Jalan Menuju Stabilitas Mencapai Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan, Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.

Arisandy, M. R., Yogawiratama, H., Susanto, D., Alpenzu, R., & Sentosa, B. A. 2023. Legalitas Perjanjian Valet Parking Di Lihat Dari Pasal 1 320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Consensus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3): 273-278.

Disemadi, Hari Sutra, and Suryasan Lau. 2021. "Bezitter Yang Beritikad Baik Dalam Memperoleh Hak Milik Atas Tanah Melalui Acquisitive Verjaring." Jatiswara 36 (2): 193-204.

Faisal, Muhammad. 2016. "Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Pemenang Lelang Sebagai Pembeli Beritikad Baik Terhadap Putusan Re-Eksekusi." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 44(1): 83-101.

Fitriani, Ifa Latifa. 2017. "Jaminan Dan Agunan Dalam Pembiayaan Bank Syariah Dan Kredit Bank Konvensional." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 47(1): 134-149.

Garner, Bryan A. 2013. Legal writing in plain English: A text with exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hikmah, Lusi Maulidatul. 2023. "Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Rekanan Bank Yang Diikat Melalui Perjanjian Kerjasama." JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT 11(1): 241-245.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno dan A. Pitlo. 1993. Bab-bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Murdianto, Jeremy Timothy. 2022. Perlindungan Kreditur Pada Penyelesaian Kredit Macet (Studi Kasus Pada PT. BPR Nusa Utara). Diss.

Parlindungan, A.P. 1996. Komentar UUHT dan Sejarah Berlakunya, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Patrik, Purwahid dan Kashadi, 2007. Hukum Jaminan Edisi revisi dengan UUHT, Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Undip.

Pranamawati, Yelina Rachma, and Arief Suryono. 2018. "Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli Lelang Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Risalah Lelangnya Dinyatakan Tidak Sah Dan Tidak Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum Mengikat oleh Pengadilan." Jurnal Repertorium 5(1)

Sardjono, Maria. 2000. Hak Jaminan dan Kepailitan I: Hak Tanggungan dan Asas Pemisahan Horisontal, Nomor 1 , Majalah Hukum Nasional.

Satrio, J. 2005. Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Silitonga, Sarma. 2020. "Tanggungjawab Debitur Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia." Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9(2): 130-153.

Sunarya, F. R. 2023. Tinjauan Yuridis Praktik Fidusia Ulang Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Terdaftar. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik 12 (2): 368-377.

Sutedi, Adrian. 2017. Sertifikat Hak atas Tanah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Syahdeni, Remi. 1999. Hak Tanggungan Asas-asas Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok dan masalah yang dihadapi oleh perbankan, Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni.

Tjoanda, M., Hetharie, Y., Pariela, M. V., & Sopamena, R. F. 2021. The Outbreak of Covid-19 as an Overmacht Claim in Credit Agreements. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1): 75-92.

Ukus, Yehezkiel William Franklin. 2023. "Eksistensi Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemberian Kredit Perbankan." LEX PRIVATUM 11(2).

Usman, Racmadi. 1999. Pasal-pasal Tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Yahya Harahap, M. 2008. “Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan”, cet. ke-6, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v3i2.1939

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yosia Hetharie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.