Default on Joint Responsibility Agreements by Debtors

Windi Friliani Abdullah; Nirwan Junus; Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba

doi:10.56591/dlj.v3i1.1829

Default on Joint Responsibility Agreements by Debtors

Windi Friliani Abdullah, Nirwan Junus, Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how the arrangement of the joint responsibility system in the lending and borrowing agreement at PNM Mekaar East City Branch 2 Gorontalo City and to find out the legal consequences and efforts to resolve defaults in joint responsibility agreements by debtors in Huangobotu Village. The research method used is Normative legal research. The research location is PNM Mekaar Office, East City Branch 2 Gorontalo City. The data obtained are primary and secondary. The data collection techniques used by the author are observation, interview, and literature. The results of the study show that the arrangement regarding the joint responsibility system in the loan and borrowing agreement at PNM Mekaar Branch Kota Timur 2 Gorontalo City is under the provisions of the applicable rules as stated in Article 1278 of the Civil Code concerning joint responsibility or joint responsibility where the joint responsibility agreement can occur over the will or agreement of the parties and must be expressly stated in the agreement.

Moreover, the type of joint responsibility applied by business groups in the village of Huangobotu is a type of passive joint responsibility, as stated in Article 1280 of the Civil Code. Moreover, the legal consequences of default in the lending and borrowing agreement with a joint responsibility system at PNM Mekaar East City 2 Branch City of Gorontalo in Huangobotu Village are payment of achievements by each group member and requests for the fulfillment of achievements by PNM Mekaar East City 2 Branch of Gorontalo City to the person in charge of customers who do not fulfill these obligations. Moreover, efforts to resolve defaults by PNM Mekaar Branch Kota Timur 2 Kota Gorontalo are more to the approach of deliberation or mediation with customers to find the right settlement solution.

Keywords

Default; Joint Liability; Debtor

Full Text:

PDF

References

Basir, Abd, and Asba Hamid. 2021. “Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan BPKB Antara Nasabah Dan PT. Permodalan Nasional Madani (Studi Pt Pnm Sulbar).” Alauddin Law Development Journal 3 (3): 626–37.

Fadhil, Fakhry, and Ahmad Ropei. 2022. “Sistem Pembayaran Tangung Renteng Dalam Narasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Studi PNM Mekaar Cabang Cisauk Tangerang).” Al-Mizan: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 6 (2): 33–50.

Fajriani, Putri Rifqi, and Indra Kesuma Hadi. 2021. “WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN PINJAM MEMINJAM PADA PT. PERMODALAN NASIONAL MADANI (PNM) MEKAAR CABANG DARUSSALAM.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan 5 (3): 487–856.

Gatot Supramono, S. H. 2014. Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Kencana.

“Hasil Wawancara Dengan Kepala PNM Mekaar Cabang Kota Timur 2 Kota Gorontalo.” n.d.

“Hasil Wawancara Dengan Pimpinan PNM Mekaar Cabang Kota Timur 2 Kota Gorontalo.” n.d.

Irawan, Irlenia Febryanty, Suharmoko Suharmoko, and Rokhimah Rokhimah. 2022. “Penerapan Sistem Tanggung Renteng Dalam Kelancaran Pembayaran Kredit Nasabah Perspektif Ekonomi Islam.” At-Thariqah: Jurnal Ekonomi 2 (2): 140–54.

Lukum, Silvana, and Mutia Cherawaty Thalib. 2022. “Responsibilities of PT. Bumi Putera Insurance Against Customer Claims Due to Default Actions.” Damhil Law Journal 1 (1): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v1i1.1739.

Mahendra, Ketut Jodi, Komang Febrinayanti Dantes, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. 2022. “PENYELAMATAN DAN PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KREDIT MACET ATAS PEMBERIAN MODAL USAHA MIKRO KECIL MENENGAH DI PT PERMODALAN NASIONAL MADANI MEKAAR SERIRIT.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 5 (2): 175–91.

Mantili, Rai. 2019. “Tanggung Jawab Renteng Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Atas Perbuatan Melawan Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4 (1): 88–111.

Paendong, Kristiane. 2022. “Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata.” LEX PRIVATUM 10 (3).

“PP No. 38 Tahun 1999 Tentang Penyertaan Modal Negara Republik Indonesia Untuk Pendirian Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Koperasi, Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah [JDIH BPK RI].” n.d. Accessed April 10, 2023. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/54324/pp-no-38-tahun-1999.

Regina, Tannia, Tedi Rochendi, and Arya Nanda Pratama. 2021. “PROSEDUR PINJAMAN TANGGUNG RENTENG UNTUK MODAL USAHA UMKM PADA UNIT JASA KEUANGAN KOPERASI GARUDAYAKSA NUSANTARA (KGN).” KOMPLEKSITAS: JURNAL ILMIAH MANAJEMEN, ORGANISASI DAN BISNIS 10 (2): 31–40.

Renata, Sherry, and Hanafi Tanawijaya. 2019. “PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN HUTANG PIUTANG ATAS DASAR KEPERCAYAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR: 2683 K/Pdt./2016).” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2 (1): 1090–1114.

Santoso, Lukman. 2019. Aspek Hukum Perjanjian: Kajian Komprehensif Teori Dan Perkembangnnya. Vol. 1. Penebar Media Pustaka.

Saripudin, Udin. 2016. “Sistem Tanggung Renteng Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi Kasus Di UPK Gerbang Emas Bandung).” Iqtishadia 6 (2): 379–403.

Septina, Chindi, Fatimah Yunus, and Evan Stiawan. 2023. “ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET (STUDI PADA PERMODALAN NASIONAL SYARI’AH CABANG KOTA BENGKULU).” GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal 4 (1): 30–37.

Sevina, Afifah Nazla, Suryani Suryani, and Ratu Humaemah. 2022. “Analisis Minat Masyarakat Memilih Pembiayaan Di PNM Mekar Syariah Cabang Kronjo Kabupaten Tangerang Menurut Perspektif Ekonomi Islam.” Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 8 (2): 243–52.

Wahyuni, Novy, Fadilla Fadilla, and Meriyati Meriyati. 2022. “Analisis Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Praktik Pembiayaan Sistem Tanggung Renteng (Studi Kasus PNM Mekaar Cabang Talang Kelapa Palembang).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA) 2 (2): 323–40.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v3i1.1829