MENINGKATKAN MINAT DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPS MATERI BERBAGAI PEKERJAAN MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SCRAMBLE DI KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 07 LEMITO

Wahdian Dunggio, Evi Hulukati, Sukarman Kamuli

Abstract


Wahdian Dunggio, 2020. "Increasing Interest and Student Learning Outcomes in Social Sciences Subjects in a Variety of Occupations Through the Seizure Learning Model in Class IV of Public Elementary School 07 Lemito". Thesis, Social Studies Concentration Program Postgraduate Basic Education, Gorontalo State University. Advisors (1) Prof. Dr. Evi Hulukati M.Pd, Advisor (2) Dr. Sukarman Kamuli, M.Sc.                            

The purpose of this research is to: To learn whether the scramble learning model can increase interest and learning outcomes in social studies class IV students at Lemito State Elementary School 07. This research uses classroom action research. The research phase consists of planning, implementing actions, observing, and reflecting. The object of the research was grade IV students of SDN 07 Lemito, Lemito District, Pohuwato Regency. Data collection techniques are: 1) observation sheets of teacher activities and student activities during the learning process and 2) tests of student learning outcomes. The research hypothesis is that if social science learning is carried out using the Scramble Learning Model, the students' interest and learning outcomes in grade IV students of SDN 07 Lemito, Lemito District, Pohuwato Regency will increase, with an indicator of maximal learning spending of 80% while for indicators of the amount of money sought is a minimum student value 75 increased from 67% to a minimum of 86%.

As a conclusion of this research are: The use of Scramble learning models can increase student learning interest in various subjects Social Studies subjects. This can be proven by an increase in each indicator of interest in learning from cycle I to cycle II. At the time of implementing the action, I only chose 56.5%. Furthermore, the indicator of interest in the first cycle only 53.5% experienced an increase in the second cycle to 83.5%, while the attention indicator in the first cycle only 56.6% increased to 83%. 80% and have met the indicators of success. The use of the struggle for learning models in social studies subjects in addition to increasing interest in learning can also improve student learning outcomes in the cognitive or knowledge domain. This is evidenced by the increase in student learning outcomes by 19%, while in the first cycle that completed learning by 67% or 10 students increased to 86% or 13 students in the second cycle.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi dkk. 2019. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Aris Shoimin. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Aunurrahman. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta

Baharuddin. (2009). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Budinuryanto, J. dkk. (1997). Pengajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Dadan Djuanda. (2006). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia yang Komunikatif dan Menyenangkan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Djemari Mardapi. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes. Jogjakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Dwi Okta Anggraini (2008). Upaya Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII C SMP Negeri 3 Sewon pada Mata Pelajaran IPS melalui Metode Penilaian Instan (Instan Assessment). Diakses dari www.digilibuny.ac.id tanggal 22 Juli 2019 pukul 17.05 WITA.

Fatikhatul Jannah. (2010). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Siswa Kelas X-4 dalam Belajar Bahasa Arab. Diakses dari www.digilib.uinsuka.ac.id tanggal 22 Juli 2019 pukul 12:37 WITA

Giarti, I. (2012). Penerapan Strategi Scramble untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Pemahaman Konsep dalam Pembelajaran Matematika (PTK Pada Siswa Di Kelas VII Semester Genap SMP N 2 Banyudono) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Miftahul Huda. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Najati, C. S. (2015). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan membaca dan menulis melalui penggunaan model pembelajaran Scramble pada siswa kelas ii sd brajan, tamantirto kasihan bantul tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal PGSD Indonesia, 1(2).

Nana Sudjana. (2005). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru

Nana Sudjana. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Pipit Sugiharti. (2011). “Penggunaan Metode Scramble pada pembelajaran fisika untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa” Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur-Nomor 16/Tahun ke-10/Juni 2011. (http://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?q=jurnal+penggunaan+metode+Scramble&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5).Jakarta Barat: BPK Penabur.

Rachmawati, S., Muchtar, I., & Shaleh, U. H. (2014). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VI Mata Pelajaran Pkn Materi Pokok Demokrasi Melalui Penerapan Model pembelajaran Scramble di SD Negeri Kademangan 1 Bondowoso. Jurnal Edukasi, 1(1), 10-14.

Slameto. (2013). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Soeparno. (1988). Media Pengajaran Bahasa. Klaten: PT Intan Pariwara

Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syaiful Bhari Djamarah. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Yudrik Jahja. (2011). Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.